« Less can be more: Preparing for the recovery in uncertain times | Main | Market and Non-Market Co-Creation »

March 10, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83420954c53ef011168d0db03970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference True Innovation?:

Comments

debbie chaplo

My daughter was asked a question at school....Why is it difficult to identify a truly new innovation that is marketable? please help

Chris

Hi Ed
Thanks for your comment and question.

I would characterise ODI as a process add-on that provides new units of analysis or opportunity to do the majority of the innovation job more effectively.

Its a front-end add-on to pre-development innovation activities (hence our definition above). It provides alternative more robust, less ambiguous units of analysis / opportunity or inputs for innovation strategy formulation, market sizing / segmentation, concept generation, pipeline review, positioning etc etc. - all downstream activities.

Gary Hamel says in Management Innovation that companies perenially struggle to balance creativity with discipline. We argue that having the right units of analysis for creativity is key to achieving this balance. Existing creative activities need not be replaced - just focused on known opportunties. ODI permits this shift from invention / idea-first to needs-first -with the needs stated very explicitly and independent of current technologies / solutions.

Some more on pur views on the flaws of idea-first thinking can be found here: http://www.strategyn.co.uk/Newsletter/The%20flaws%20of%20idea-first%20thinking.asp

Very happy to connect and explain more..

best rgds

Chris

Edward Savage

Hi Chris,

Interesting flyer. Would you consider innovation a separate process to be managed?

I ask because I have found resistance to "Innovation", seen as a BIG change, but far less resistance to "tools to help you do your job better" seen as a little change.

This document challenges a few of the preconceptions around what innovation is, and that is great. It does leave the impression that to become an innovation organisation it requires a discontinuous event (an architecture!) that has to be brought in as opposed to everyday changes in behaviour.

How would you characterise the implementation of the ODI process? Does it build on current practices or replace them?

Thanks for the post. Made me think!

Ed

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe in Bloglines

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 11/2003

Become a Fan